The House of Representatives on Tuesday
faulted the current pricing template for Premium Motor Spirit, better
known as petrol, saying that a realistic pump price should not be above
N70.04 per litre.
It, therefore, asked the Petroleum
Products Pricing Regulatory Agency and Ministry of Petroleum Resources
to review the current price template of PMS with a view to bringing down
the price of the product.
The landing cost of the product today is
N119.74k, while the distribution margin and other costs add up to
N18.37k, bringing the total to N138.11k.
However, marketers are allowed to sell petrol in the range of N140 and N145 per litre.
But, on Tuesday, the House, acting on a
motion moved by Mr. Abubakar Hassan-Fulata, noted that 90 per cent of
the current cost of PMS (N124.34k) was introduced by factors that were
unnecessary.
It said the factors were related to transport charges, which were transferred to consumers by the marketers.
Lawmakers argued that removing such
unnecessary charges would not affect the profit margin of the marketers
if the Federal Government put all the needed infrastructure in place.
In his lead debate, Hassan-Fulata listed
some of the charges as lightering expenses, N4.56k; bridging fund,
N6.20k; freight, N109.01k; NPA charges, N0.84k; and transport allowance,
N3.36k.
He also said the landing cost had
inbuilt charges that when removed would not affect the profit margins of
the importers and marketers.
The lawmaker cited jetty charges, NIMASA
charges, storage charges and retailers’ margin, among others, as costs
that could be removed without affecting the profit margin of the
marketers.
For instance, he stated that the current
bridging charge of N6.20k could be reduced to just N2.00 per litre if
the pipelines linking the refineries and the depots across the country
were not vandalised.
Hassan-Fulata, “Bridging is supposed to
be an annual event only when the refineries are carrying out their
turnaround maintenance, which does not exceed three months.
“However, due to the fact that the
pipelines linking the various depots have been vandalised or are in a
state of disrepair, bridging has remained a permanent feature of the oil
industry in Nigeria.”
Similarly, he said the N2.00 built into
the price for the maintenance of storage facilities was wasteful as it
did not benefit any public-owned depot.
“The fund goes to enrich an ever-growing
number of private depot owners, whose facilities have now become the
official storage facilities for government products, while government
facilities are allowed to decay,” he told the House.
Many lawmakers also faulted the N4.56
lightering charge on the ground that vessels conveying products into the
country were not docking directly at the harbours.
The motion for the review of the pump
price received unanimous endorsement of members at Tuesday’s plenary,
which was presided over by the Speaker, Mr. Yakubu Dogara.
The House directed the Ministry of Petroleum Resources to ensure that the price review was done within eight weeks.
However, petroleum products’ marketers faulted the call for petrol to be sold at N70 per litre.
According to them, the landing cost alone is far higher than N70 at over N128 per litre.
The marketers stated that the challenge
in accessing foreign exchange and the fall of the naira against the
United States dollar were factors that would make it practically
impossible to sell petrol below the regulated rate of N145 per litre.
They told one of our correspondents that
the Federal Government still owed them subsidy claims as well as
differentials as a result of accrued interests on the debt, running into
several billions of naira.
A member of the Major Oil Marketers
Association of Nigeria said, “What are their reasons for calling for N70
petrol price? Are they aware of the current economic realities and how
the oil and gas sector operates? It is practically impossible at the
moment, despite the huge debt being owed us, other factors show that it
can’t happen.”
The Group General Manager, Group Public
Affairs Division, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Mr. Ndu
Ughamadu, said that the oil firm would not react to the demands of the
House of Representatives.
This, he said, was because the corporation had yet to get any directive to that effect from the House.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I like knowing my fans better. Kindly drop your comment using your name/url/Google accounts and not as Anonymous. Thanks for your understanding.