Read the concise message she posed on IG a while ago:
"Lord I am not prefect! I may have failed in other areas of my life but as a mother to my kids and to the other kids I have chosen to be a mother to I will never ever fail.
That's my greatest determination in life #greatsinglemothers #greatmothers #greatstrongwomen #pillarsofhomes.
It's not easy but no one said it would be, so stop blaming, stop crying, stop seeking pity, stop feeling like a loser, stop hoping 4 what is not n focus on how to make it happen.
You re not a weaker vessel, u re d mother to d great generation in ur care, get up n fight for those helpless kids who didn't beg to come to this world but it was ur choice whether u accept it or not ur kids they look up to u.
Your smile is their hope, so let ur weakness be ur loving kids n ur strength be that ur kids succeed in life! Never abandon ur kids! I tell u, u will find ur happiness in fulfilling ur greatest job as a mother!"
Please like us on www.Facebook.com/ Olokunbola Blessing'blog
A woman living in the United Kingdom claims she was punished for being
too good looking after stealing more than $95,000 in council money and
spending it on designer clothes.
Michaelea Hutchings, 23, blew the money on shoes, handbags and
sunglasses last year and has been ordered to pay back all the money
before Christmas Eve or face jail time.
The money had been accidentally transferred into her account by
Lichfield Council in central England.
But Hutchings said she was targeted because she is pretty and that
authorities would have been a lot more lenient if “she wasn’t much to
look at”.
“They’re punishing me because of the way I look,” she said. “If I wasn’t much to look at and played the card of ‘Oh, I only get this a month, I was in a bit of a sticky situation’, I reckon I’d have got a slap on the wrist and just paid back a fiver a week.”
She was charged with retaining a wrongful credit and given a one-year community order with 150 hours of unpaid work.
Hutching’s has repaid most of the money but is considering appealing her “unfair” repayments.
“I pleaded guilty, but the only person guilty is the person who put the money in my account. I don’t think I should have been punished the way I was. It’s just outrageous.”
Do you agree with her?
- See more at: http://www.gistplanets.com/2014/07/woman-claims-she-was-punished-for-being.html#more“They’re punishing me because of the way I look,” she said. “If I wasn’t much to look at and played the card of ‘Oh, I only get this a month, I was in a bit of a sticky situation’, I reckon I’d have got a slap on the wrist and just paid back a fiver a week.”
She was charged with retaining a wrongful credit and given a one-year community order with 150 hours of unpaid work.
Hutching’s has repaid most of the money but is considering appealing her “unfair” repayments.
“I pleaded guilty, but the only person guilty is the person who put the money in my account. I don’t think I should have been punished the way I was. It’s just outrageous.”
Do you agree with her?
THE
Higher National Diploma (HND) holders in public service have filed a
motion before the National Industrial Court, Abuja, challenging their
discrimination in career progression in public service.
Hearing
in the matter was, last Friday stalled, following an application
seeking an extension of time to file a reply by A.K. Kamar, who appeared
for the Head of Service of the Federation, saying his office was not
aware that the matter would hold on that day.
The
president of the National Industrial Court, Justice Babatunde Adejumo,
who presided over the matter, then ordered the defence counsel to
regularise their replies and file same before the next adjourned date,
September 18.
The
originating summons brought by Garba Bello, Babatunde Samuel, Jubril
Kadiri, Christiana Owolabi, Chuba Umechukwu and Fatima Ahmed, on behalf
of members of the association, also listed the National Council on
Establishments and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as
defendants.
The
claimants want the court to make an order directing the defendants to
implement the directives of the government’s white paper on the report
of the Presidential Committee on the Consolidation of Emoluments in the
Public Sector.
While
making an appeal for speedy hearing on the matter, their counsel,
Nnaemeka Ejiofor, told the court that HND holders in public service were
not allowed to rise beyond Grade Level 14, as against their B.Sc
counterparts, no matter their level of competence.
Speaking
after the hearing, president of Nigerian Association of Technologists
in Engineering (NATE), Leo Okereke, explained that all the Ministries,
Departments and Agencies (MDAs) have continued to discriminate against
HND holders in the public service. He wondered the fate of thousands of
graduates and undergraduates of polytechnics in the country.
In
his averment, Garba Bello said that President Olusegun Obasanjo in 2004
and 2005 embarked on public sector reform and constituted a committee
to address the disparity in the public service.
He
added that a white paper committee was set up in 2007 for the
consolidation of emoluments and in 2008, an implementation committee was
also set up.
He
maintained that despite these “recommendations and conclusions, the
applicants and other holders of the HND certificates are still being
discriminated against and still suffer at various work places.”
- See more at:
http://www.funmykemmy.com/2014/07/hnd-vs-bsc-hnd-holders-take.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook#sthash.COw6UykA.dpuf
THE
Higher National Diploma (HND) holders in public service have filed a
motion before the National Industrial Court, Abuja, challenging their
discrimination in career progression in public service.
Hearing
in the matter was, last Friday stalled, following an application
seeking an extension of time to file a reply by A.K. Kamar, who appeared
for the Head of Service of the Federation, saying his office was not
aware that the matter would hold on that day.
The
president of the National Industrial Court, Justice Babatunde Adejumo,
who presided over the matter, then ordered the defence counsel to
regularise their replies and file same before the next adjourned date,
September 18.
The
originating summons brought by Garba Bello, Babatunde Samuel, Jubril
Kadiri, Christiana Owolabi, Chuba Umechukwu and Fatima Ahmed, on behalf
of members of the association, also listed the National Council on
Establishments and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as
defendants.
The
claimants want the court to make an order directing the defendants to
implement the directives of the government’s white paper on the report
of the Presidential Committee on the Consolidation of Emoluments in the
Public Sector.
While
making an appeal for speedy hearing on the matter, their counsel,
Nnaemeka Ejiofor, told the court that HND holders in public service were
not allowed to rise beyond Grade Level 14, as against their B.Sc
counterparts, no matter their level of competence.
Speaking
after the hearing, president of Nigerian Association of Technologists
in Engineering (NATE), Leo Okereke, explained that all the Ministries,
Departments and Agencies (MDAs) have continued to discriminate against
HND holders in the public service. He wondered the fate of thousands of
graduates and undergraduates of polytechnics in the country.
In
his averment, Garba Bello said that President Olusegun Obasanjo in 2004
and 2005 embarked on public sector reform and constituted a committee
to address the disparity in the public service.
He
added that a white paper committee was set up in 2007 for the
consolidation of emoluments and in 2008, an implementation committee was
also set up.
He
maintained that despite these “recommendations and conclusions, the
applicants and other holders of the HND certificates are still being
discriminated against and still suffer at various work places.”
- See more at:
http://www.funmykemmy.com/2014/07/hnd-vs-bsc-hnd-holders-take.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook#sthash.COw6UykA.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment
I like knowing my fans better. Kindly drop your comment using your name/url/Google accounts and not as Anonymous. Thanks for your understanding.